PSD Sensor
Contents
Introduction
This page will present the development of the Camera Turbidity and PSD Sensor. More introductions to come...
Development Log
04 July 2022
The very first experiment...
Camera
OmniVision OV2640 Camera, 640*480, JPG output, default camera settings (automatic exposure, gain, and white balance), lens not changed. The camera is connected to a ArduCAM Arduino Shield which is compatible with the Arduino Mega board. The board is set up using ArduCAM's Arduino Library. When taking images, the Arduino Mega is connected directly to the PC, and the images are sent and saved on the PC directly, for now.
Turbidity Solution
The tap water is mixed with natural silts to create the synthetic solution. The turbidity value ranges from 0 to 639 NTU in this experiment.
Methods
First, put the synthetic turbidity solution into the 3d-printed black container, after measuring the actual turbidity (in the unit of NTU) using the Thermo Fisher turbidity meter. Then, light up the LED (from the top hole of the container lid) and take images (from the side window) of the solution at a 90-degree angle. This light scattering method is a common method used for turbidity measurement. Generally, when the water is more turbid, the increased particles in the water scatter more light beams in directions other than the straight direction, hence the light intensity received from the side directions (such as 90 degrees) will increase. The RGB (red, green, and blue) values of each pixel of the images are obtained using python script and converted into a single value - grayscale (0 - 255, completely black to completely white) using the Luma formula (Y = 0.299R + 0.587G + 0.114B). The average grayscale value of all pixels of each photo is calculated. Finally, plot the relationship between the average grayscale value of each image and its corresponding solution turbidity.
Results
As shown in the plot, there is a linear relationship between the log(NTU) and average grayscale, with the squared-R = 0.8726. However, this result is not good at all, as the grayscale values almost plateau when the turbidity values go above 100 NTU. This may be attributed to the strength of the LED. To be more specific, the light intensity of the LED is too strong, hence when the turbidity reaches a certain value (more than 100 in this case), the particles in the water have already scattered too much light that the camera is not able to handle. Therefore, in future experiments, the LED intensity should be lowered. Another issue of this experiment is that the silts are so heavy that they settle down very quickly, thus the actual turbidity of the solution may also change quickly. Moreover, the container design should be improved so that the camera can be placed in a relatively fixed position near the "window".
10 August 2022
The second experiment with a great number of changes.
Camera
Camera changed to OmniVision OV7675 Camera for better documentation, size changed to 320*240, format changed to BMP output, camera setting changed (automatic exposure, gain, and white balance are disabled), lens not changed. The connection and software of the new camera remain the same as previous one.
Turbidity Solution
To overcome the problem that the settlement of turbidity particles is too fast, the standard turbidity solution is used this time. 4000 NTU Formazin turbidity standard solution and DI water are used to make standard solutions with the following turbidity values: 0 (pure water), 25, 50, 75, 100, 200, 300, and 400 NTU. The actual turbidity of each solution is measured and differs from the "standard value". The actual turbidity values are used in the plotting.
Methods
Most of the processes remain the same with the following few exceptions. (1) The 3d-printed container design is improved, so the camera can be placed in a relatively fixed position. (2) In the previous experiment, the software provided in the ArduCAM library is used to take and save images. But this time a Python script is used to obtain the images, hence we can set the image format to bitmap (BMP). (3) Most importantly, the white LED used for the experiment is tested with 3 resistors (20, 470, and 4700 ohms) which can provide different levels of light intensity (strong, moderate, and weak).
Results
1. All Data Points
2. High Intensity - all data
3. High Intensity - excluding 1 NTU
4. Moderate Intensity - excluding 400 NTU
5. Moderate Intensity - range 0-100 NTU
6. Low Intensity - all data
7. Low Intensity - range 100-400 NTU
High Intensity: If we look at the turbidity estimation ranging from 0 to 400 NTU, the LED with full brightness is not ideal, as there is no correlation found. However, the hypothesis is that high-intensity LED may be useful when the turbidity is in a low range, and the strong scattered light may be sensitive to the change of turbidity in that range. Further experiments are needed to test this hypothesis.
Moderate Intensity: The average grayscale values for 300 and 400 NTU are almost the same, the assumption is that the detection limit is also reached for this level of LED intensity. Excluding 400 NTU, we are able to find a good linear relationship (R2 = 0.9837). And surprisingly, the range below 100 NTU shows a nearly perfect linear relationship (R2 = 0.9994).
Low Intensity: Although the images taken are extremely dark and I could not distinguish them using naked eyes, the linear relationship looks not bad (R2 = 0.9641). It appears that the linear relationship for the NTU ranging above 100 looks better (R2 = 0.9891). A consistent hypothesis is that, with the low LED intensity, the camera may be able to estimate the very turbid solutions. Further experiments are needed to test beyond 400 NTU.
19 August 2022
The completely replication of the previous experiment.
Camera
Same as the previous experiment.
Turbidity Solution
Same as the previous experiment. The turbidity solution is the one used in the previous experiment, but the actual turbidity values are all re-measured.
Methods
Same as the previous experiment.
Results
1. Comparison between Two Experiment Results
2. Combination of Two Experiment Results
3. Moderate Intensity - range 0-100 NTU
4. Experiment Setup
The results are very consistent with the previous one and prove the repeatability of the experiment. The squared-R values of the linear relationships in this experiment are slightly decreased, but the decrease is not significant. Nevertheless, the moderate-intensity LED shows a nearly perfect linear relationship for the turbidity values ranging from 0 to 100 NTU, again.
These two experiments are conducted based on the standard turbidity solutions to avoid the issue of fast settling of the particles, but this is only a temporary solution to the issue. In the subsequent experiments, I will change the solution back to the synthetic solutions, while trying to make the measurement more accurate.
25 August 2022
This experiment uses the solution synthesised with air-dry clay (used for DIY crafts).
Camera
Same as the previous experiment.
Turbidity Solution
The solution is changed from the standard turbidity solution to the air-dry clay solution. The air-dry clay is usually used for DIY crafts and is finer than the natural clay and silt. Hence, the finer clay in the solution will settle much less slowly than the natural clay and silt. It makes doing the experiment easier and the results more accurate. The actual turbidity value of the clay solution ranges from 0 to 450 NTU.
Methods
Same as the previous experiment.
Results
1. Clay Solutions (400 and 100 NTU)
2. Raw Experiment Data
3. Result Comparision with Previously Used Standard Solution
4. High Intensity (Range 0-50 NTU)
5. Moderate Intensity (Range 0-150 NTU)
6. Low Intensity (Range 50-450 NTU)
Overall： The general trends for the clay solution and standard solution are similar. But if having a closer look, we can see the linear relationships for clay solution are much weaker, and their trendline slopes are also less steep.
High Intensity: The results approve the hypothesis that the LED in full brightness provides sensitive and accurate estimation for a lower range of turbidity value (R2 = 0.9959). Despite the fact that the material of the 3d-printed container is reflective and it may be a factor interfering with the image capturing, especially when the turbidity value is very low.
Moderate Intensity: A strong linear relationship existed for standard turbidity solution at a range from 0 NTU up to 400 NTU. But the strong linear relationship only exists for clay solution at a range from 0 NTU up to 150 NTU. (Figure 5 and figures in previous experiments)
Low Intensity: The results of this experiment are not very ideal due to the outliers at 200 NTU, for an unknown reason. If we ignore the outliers, the overall linear relationship is still relatively strong. Regardless, the sensibility (slope) of the relationship is extremely low (0.0067 grayscale per 1 NTU). According to Figure 6, it is consistent that at this level of light intensity, the images are totally dark when the turbidity value is lower than 50 NTU, and the linear relationship is good from 50 NTU all the way up to 400+ NTU if the outliers at 200 NTU are a pure error.
Questions to be answered:
- Bulleted list item
No need to compare with the standard turbidity solution in the future. Yes. But why do the linear trendlines have such different slope?
- Bulleted list item
Can the handcrafting clay solution represent the natural stormwater? Regardless, how to solve the problem of fast settlement when dealing with natural stormwater?
- Bulleted list item
For the 470-Ohm LED, why does the linear relationship disappear as early as the turbidity values go beyond 150 NTU?
- Bulleted list item
What’s next, other than finding the answers to the previous questions?
- Bulleted list item
Do I still need to try to find another resistance value?
